ARTICLE
E214 PrEd132 THE TEACHER and THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM
LESSON 1.2: LEARNING TASKS
Curriculum Planning and Systems Change
The Article Curriculum Planning and Systems Change described the three basic domains of curriculum planning which can be viewed as three constituents systems. It discussed the interrelationships and the implications of these domains for curriculum planning for significant change. Also, it tackled about the three common models of curriculum planning which are intended to bring about significant curricular change.
Curriculum planning refers to the decision-making process concerning the substance of schooling such as the knowledge, skills, and dispositions that constitute the experience and outcome of schooling. There are three levels of curriculum planning namely: Institutional Curriculum Planning, Programmatic Curriculum Planning, and Classroom Curriculum Planning. Institutional Curriculum Planning is characterized by discourse on curriculum policy at the intersection between schooling, culture, and society (Westbury, 2000). Programmatic Curriculum Planning is at the intermediate levels between institutional curriculum and classroom curriculum planning, with a focus on curriculum writing in the form of curriculum documents and materials (Doyle, 1992a). And Classroom Curriculum Planning also called curriculum as event or the enacted curriculum, is characterized by a cluster of events jointly developed by a teacher and a group of students within a particular classroom (Doyle,1992a, 1992b). These three levels of curriculum planning are interrelated and interdependent; each does not function in isolation of others. All three levels of curriculum planning are necessary and need to work together in a way that ensures sustainable curricular change at the classroom level.
None of the levels can be undermined without undermining a vital factor in curriculum planning and development. With this in mind, three common models of curriculum planning – namely: Top-Down Model, Bottom-Up Model, and Combination – that intend to bring about
significant curricular change, or by implication, systems change was considered.
The roles of an individual teacher or a team of teachers in curriculum planning is that they are the one responsible for identifiable students, deciding alone or with students what shall occur in a specific educational setting. School teachers as well implement the documents and materials in classroom. Lastly, they can participate in what is called school-based curriculum development (SBCD) in which they articulate their own visions and goals of teaching, develop their own curriculum materials in the light of their visions and goals, and put the materials into practice with students. On the other hand, the roles of administrators in curriculum planning is that they are the one who make decisions concerning the adoption of a particular curriculum framework and related materials as the programmatic curriculum for the school.
In terms of schooling, its purpose based on my research is to build a progressed society, and to provide for the fullest possible development of each learner for living morally, creatively, and productively in a society he belonged to. Moreover, the curriculum prepare students to meet the current and future challenges of the social and political order by helping them learn and develop how to evaluate information accuracy, helping them learn through their strengths, and by applying their learnings beyond the classroom.